
![]() |
Bad Boys Porsche: Expensive lessons in procurement practicesWhen Bad Boys hit the big screen in 1995, it became an instant classic with fast cars, big explosions and a no-nonsense crime-fighting duo. One of the most memorable features of the film was the sleek black Porsche 911 Turbo driven by Will Smith’s character. It turns out that this very car is now at the centre of a high-profile fraud case involving Investec and Stanbic, highlighting just how vulnerable even the most sophisticated institutions can be to deception. ![]() Image source: azerbaijan_stockers from Freepik The case, which revolves around a false bank guarantee, demonstrates that fraud can slip through the cracks even in organisations with extensive financial controls. If billion-rand institutions can be misled by fraudulent documentation, what does that mean for businesses that don’t have the same resources? The truth is that procurement fraud is a risk for everyone, from multinational corporations to small family-run enterprises. Without proper safeguards, businesses leave themselves exposed to financial losses, reputational damage and costly legal battles. Types of procurement fraudAt a recent procurement workshop, I shared a concerning statistic: there are at least 28 different types of procurement fraud, and they manifest in ways that are often difficult to detect. Fraud isn’t always an elaborate, high-stakes operation - it often begins with seemingly small oversights. One of the most common tactics is false invoicing, where businesses are charged for goods or services that were never delivered. In some cases, an employee may be complicit in this scheme, working with an external party to syphon funds. Then there’s bid rigging, where suppliers collude to fix tender outcomes, leading to inflated costs and poor-quality service. Other forms of procurement fraud include kickbacks, where employees receive personal incentives for awarding contracts; duplicate payments, where invoices are processed multiple times without verification; and the use of shell companies, which is the use of fake suppliers created with the sole purpose of funnelling money out of a business. These schemes may seem obvious in isolation, but in the complexity of day-to-day operations, they can go unnoticed for months or even years. Recent reports from SAS and IBM have found that procurement fraud accounts for nearly 40% of all business fraud cases. The issue isn’t just about financial loss; it has far-reaching implications. Weak procurement controls can expose a business to compliance violations, disrupt supply chains and even lead to regulatory scrutiny. Many businesses only realise the extent of their exposure after suffering significant financial damage. In extreme cases, procurement fraud has been the downfall of otherwise thriving companies. Lessons from recent case law: Business email compromise and procurement fraudOne of the key lessons from case law, including ENS v Hawarden and Gripper & Company v Ganedhi Trading Enterprises, is that fraud often happens because of loopholes in contracts and a lack of due diligence. The ENS v Hawarden case, in particular, provides critical insight into modern fraud risks. The case involved a business email compromise (BEC) fraud, where a third party intercepted communication between a buyer and a law firm, altering banking details to divert funds to a fraudulent account. Initially, the High Court ruled that ENS, the law firm, was liable for failing to prevent the fraud. However, the Supreme Court of Appeal overturned this decision, stating that businesses and individuals must take reasonable steps to protect themselves from cyber fraud. The ruling reinforced the importance of verifying banking details before making payments, a crucial lesson for procurement practices. Similarly, Gripper & Company v Ganedhi Trading Enterprises [2024] highlighted that the burden of verification falls on the debtor. The Western Cape High Court ruled that a purchaser’s obligation to pay does not end simply because they were misled into paying the wrong account. The judgment stated: The golden thread in the judgments referred to supra places an obligation on the purchaser to ensure that the bank account details contained in the invoice are in fact correct/verified and that payment is made to the seller and not to an unknown third party. Failure to do so, and where payment is made into an incorrect bank account, such incorrect payment does not extinguish the purchaser’s obligation and liability to pay the debt. This case further reinforces that businesses must proactively verify banking details before payments are processed, particularly in procurement transactions. How businesses can mitigate procurement fraud risks1. Strengthening due diligence in supplier verificationVetting suppliers thoroughly is essential, and this process should go beyond a surface-level review of credentials. Businesses should:
Bank guarantees and letters of credit, while helpful, should not be relied upon as absolute proof of legitimacy. Fraudsters have become increasingly sophisticated in fabricating documentation, and a failure to scrutinise these guarantees can lead to serious financial losses. 2. Tightening procurement contractsMany businesses use outdated contract templates that fail to address modern fraud tactics. Contracts should include:
These clauses should be reviewed regularly and updated to reflect new risks and regulatory changes. 3. Implementing internal controls and fraud detection mechanismsBusinesses must go beyond finance-based controls and ensure that procurement fraud prevention is part of their broader business processes. Some of the controls businesses can consider include:
Additionally, businesses must recognise that procurement fraud is not solely a finance issue but that it affects all levels of an organisation. Employees across all departments should be trained to identify red flags such as:
Investing in SMEs for a stronger supply chainThe procurement landscape isn’t just about avoiding fraud - it’s about building a resilient supply chain. One of the most effective ways to do this is by investing in SMEs and supplier development. Research from SME.TAX highlights how equipping SMEs with proper compliance and governance structures can create a more reliable and competitive supplier base. As we’ve seen from the Bad Boys Porsche case and recent legal rulings, even the most secure financial institutions can be deceived. The difference between those who recover quickly and those who suffer long-term consequences often comes down to the strength of their procurement practices. Fraud prevention isn’t about reacting to incidents after they occur. Instead, it’s about building robust systems that make fraud difficult in the first place. The lesson here is clear: when it comes to fraud, prevention is always better than cure. The question is, will your business be ready? About Ginen MoodleyGinen Moodley is an attorney and founding director of Moodley Attorneys Incorporated (MAinc), which is a corporate and commercial legal practice that helps international stakeholders establish businesses in South Africa. View my profile and articles... |